{"id":165116,"date":"2021-06-14T13:54:33","date_gmt":"2021-06-14T13:54:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.theindustry.fashion\/shareholders-may-well-vote-against-my-bonus-says-jd-sports-chairman\/"},"modified":"2021-08-12T11:42:26","modified_gmt":"2021-08-12T11:42:26","slug":"shareholders-may-well-vote-against-my-bonus-says-jd-sports-chairman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theindustry.fashion\/shareholders-may-well-vote-against-my-bonus-says-jd-sports-chairman\/","title":{"rendered":"Shareholders \"may well\" vote against my bonus, says JD Sports chairman"},"content":{"rendered":"
The chairman of JD Sports has said that shareholders \u201cmay well\u201d vote against the \u00a34.3 million bonus<\/strong> that the company is set to award him despite taking Government support to furlough its staff.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Peter Cowgill defended the payout, saying he had only received one long-term incentive payout in eight years.<\/strong><\/p>\n Speaking to BBC Radio 4\u2019s the World at One he said that shareholders could decide to vote against the bonus, something that advisory group Glass Lewis recommended in a recent report.<\/p>\n \u201cThey may well do that, but I\u2019m just saying why would you when the company has progressed?<\/strong>\u201d Cowgill said.<\/p>\n He shot back at comparisons to non-essential retailers such as Primark, who have paid back the money they claimed to keep staff on furlough.<\/p>\n \u201cAs we speak today we\u2019re under pressure on the online.\u00a0The online is a very small proportion of our income, the online in Asos is 100% of their income,<\/strong> so to compare them is absolutely ridiculous,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n He said that Primark, which is owned by AB Foods, gets a lot of its money from selling essential goods.<\/strong><\/p>\n The furlough scheme was designed to ensure that companies did not lay off workers<\/strong> during the pandemic while their businesses were forced to close.<\/p>\n The Government has paid out more than \u00a365 billion to support the scheme, which covered up to 80% of the salaries of furloughed workers.\u00a0Around \u00a386m of this went to JD Sports employees.<\/strong><\/p>\n Cowgill said: \u201cThe furlough payments, the furlough receipts were used for exactly what they were prescribed for.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cIn other words we were a company that was non-essential, that was closed, we didn\u2019t take any income,<\/strong> so you can glean from that the leaning from the overseas income.<\/p>\n \u201cSo we didn\u2019t take that, we paid that out, we actually were very relaxed in terms of in the subsequent lockdowns in terms of very light on furlough.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cWe used it to retain employment, we didn\u2019t make redundancies.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n